Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4717317" My name is Detective Gensel. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene of a 2 bedroom and 1 bath beach house. The alleged victim is Felix Navidad. He came into a lot of money when they died in a bungee jumping accident. Felix put all of his friends in his will. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode and she killed Felix to get money from his will when he died. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the secret note. The evidence was found on the floor. The test performed was a handwriting test. The results of the test was that Kendr wrote a note that says Dear Martha im so glad its over Felix is dead love,Vera. This connects the suspect to the crime scene that Kendra killed felix and framed Vera so everybody thinks Vera killed Felix instead of Kendra. Kendra did that because she didn't want to look guilty and make Vera look bad.

The next piece of evidence collected was the fingerprint. It was found near a cup by Felix's body. The test performed was the fingerprint anaylsis. The results of the test were that they found kendra and felix's fingerprint on felix's drinking cup. This connects the suspect to the crime because Kendra's fingerprints were found on Felix's cup of pop, which means she touched it.

The last piece of evidence collected was the ice cube test. It was found near the patio outside. The test performed was a Ph test. The results of the test were found that the tap water was a nuetral and then when I tested the ice water it was a base .When, I found out it was a base I knew something was wrong. This connects the suspect to the crime because Kendra had fake powder on her shoes that was on the ice tray.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Kendra was making ice cubes with the water and she got poison in them Then she let them sit for a little bit to freeze. 9What was she doing while they froze?) Then she gave Felix a glass of pop with poisoned ice cubes.After that she hopped in the shower and she starts hearing Alfredo calling out loud Felix is dead.

Therefore, Kendra Goode committed the crime of Kendra killing Felix for his money that he had in his will.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 93% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.**__  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || __**The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.__**  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__ Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  __** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 53/57